|
Biotech Rebirth?
The maturing drug development pipeline at Geron promises much more than its
much-hyped Fountain of Youth stem cell research of biotech boom days. Its
cancer vaccine advances with positive data. It's still a speculation, though,
and there are other companies better positioned.
http://www.fool.com/news/commentary/2003/commentary
030930dmn.htm?logvisit=y&source=estmarhln001999&npu=y&bounce=y&bounce2=y
By David Nierengarten
September 30, 2003
When biotech Geron (Nasdaq:
GERN) shares spiked over 50% to nearly $15.00 a share last
week, investors took notice of the good news: Geron's experimental cancer
vaccine demonstrated effectiveness in a small phase 1-2 clinical trial with
prostate cancer patients. Is it more false hope for investors interested in
this speculative company, or a solid step toward a profitable future?
The company's cancer and allegedly life-extending stem cell research
brought enormous hype during the 1999-2000 biotech bubble, with headlines
about the Fountain of Youth and New York Times pictures of the elderly
on pogo sticks. But like many other cash-burning biotechs slapped down by the
big, bad, bear market of the past three years, Geron dropped into penny stock
territory by this March before rebounding with the first hints of positive
clinical trial news in April.
Last week, CEO Thomas Okarma reported in the UBS Global Life Sciences
Conference that the patients in this high-dose trial generated very good
immune responses -- comparable to the immune response generated by traditional
mumps or measles vaccines, and the best that has ever been seen in a cancer
vaccine trial. These results show better and longer-lived responses than the
low-dose experiment reported this April that sent shares shooting up from
around $2 to over $5. In that small trial, the company reported that they had
nearly eliminated all circulating prostate cancer cells.
The vaccine is still years from any application for FDA approval, but it's
welcome progress.
The telomerase connection
The vaccine showcases telomerase, a protein isolated by Geron's scientists
that allows all cancer cells, not just prostate cancer cells, to keep dividing
and growing. Researchers at Geron use this protein -- not found in most normal
cells -- to stimulate specialized immune system cells with the hope that they
will then destroy any cancer cell that escaped the surgeons' scalpels.
Because the telomerase protein is present in all cancer cells, investors
are hoping that there is a universal application for Geron's cancer vaccine,
increasing the market potential of it tremendously. While the prostate cancer
market is not small, with nearly 200,000 men diagnosed with it annually and
nearly 40,000 dying from it, a "universal" cancer vaccine has far
more market potential.
Cancer vaccines: fact or fiction?
Cancer vaccines have been a Holy Grail quest for many biotechnology companies.
The reasoning is attractive -- the really deadly aspect of most cancers is the
propensity to metastasize to distant sites in the body. Because the cancer can
spread to so many sites, surgery is impossible, and chemotherapy (the standard
treatment to eliminate metastases) is toxic to the body's normal,
non-cancerous cells. So, if researchers could recruit the body's own immune
system to attack cancer cells, the colonizing cells would be destroyed, with
no toxic side effects.
Of course, there are problems. Cancer cells resemble normal cells in many
ways (after all, they are the body's own cells that have gone outlaw --
growing without regard to the body's regulations), and so the
"trick" is to develop a vaccine that will stimulate a person's
immune system to attack only cancer cells, and avoid normal cells.
A new direction
Cancer vaccines are a relatively new direction for Geron, which was founded to
find another Holy Grail, or to mix metaphors, to find the Fountain of Youth.
The same protein, telomerase, that distinguishes cancer cells also allows
normal cells to continue dividing past their usual limits. The thinking went
that by activating the protein in normal cells, the ravages of time would be
reversed. The newly rejuvenated cells could divide again, replacing worn out
old cells. In the same vein, the company has been conducting controversial
research into using embryonic stem cells to repair damaged tissue and reverse
the effects of aging.
However, Geron found its own time and cash running out as its anti-aging
research foundered. So, at the beginning of the year, the company
"refocused" (read: fired researchers) and concentrated at pushing
their oncology products through clinical trials. Spending on oncology programs
for the first half of the year totaled $8.5 million, while their regenerative
medicine program received $6 million of the R&D pie at Geron. That latter
figure is down from nearly $9 million in the year-ago period (oncology
increased slightly from $8.3 million).
Competition
Naturally, Geron is not alone in trying to develop a cancer vaccine.
Competitors abound, including some right in the prostate cancer arena, and
many other drug candidates are farther along in the drug
development pipeline than Geron's hopeful in phase 1-2 trials.
One rival is Dendreon (Nasdaq:
DNDN) Dendreon's prostate cancer vaccine, Provenge, is on
fast-track status with the FDA as they wrap up their phase 3 trial. Dendreon
also has more money in the bank ($68 million), more products in the pipeline,
and a lower market capitalization than Geron, along with ready collaborations
to develop certain drugs with Genentech (NYSE:
DNA). They're even developing a competing telomerase vaccine,
using technology licensed from Geron.
Cell Genesys (Nasdaq:
CEGE) has been working on a series of cancer vaccines that also
use a more traditional route of isolating special proteins that are found in
each different tumor type to immunize patients against a particular cancer.
Their product, GVAX, is progressing through phase 2 trials for prostate, lung,
and pancreatic cancers, along with leukemia.
Genzyme (Nasdaq:
GENZ) is also developing a vaccine that uses a patient's own
tumor cells to stimulate the immune system to reject tumors. The researcher
creates a customized vaccine for each patient by isolating their own tumor
cells and fusing them to specialized immune cells. This approach is still in
the early stages, like Geron's, but Genzyme is one of the few biotechnology
companies making money. Of course, you'll pay a premium of nearly 45 times
earnings to buy a share of this company, but at least there are earnings to
buy.
Too risky?
Like many biotech companies, Geron is not profitable. Heck, it hardly has any
revenues -- only $1.25 million over the past year, mainly from licensing
technologies. It has reduced its annual cash burn from $45 million to just
under $34 million last year, and it has $53 million left in the bank and under
$7.5 million in debt. With these financials, Geron will have to find a partner
to help shoulder the expense (and take a piece of any future profits) to bring
this vaccine through further trials.
But if things go right, there will be plenty of profits to share. So, if
you invest in a company like Geron, you're essentially speculating that FDA
approval will make the company and your investment profitable.
What could go wrong? First of all, this was a tiny trial -- only 12
patients, and it may be a statistical blip. Furthermore, there are normal
cells that do use telomerase, including the tissues that make blood cells and
those in the reproductive organs. Generating an immune response to a patient's
own reproductive organs or bone marrow seems to me to be a real possibility
with this kind of therapy, despite the promising safety data. Additionally,
cancers mutate all the time, and it's possible that a strain of cancer cells
could develop that evades the vaccination response.
I believe that Geron's technology is promising, but it's simply too risky
to buy into a company valued at over $400 million for a single phase I product
plus a handful of preclinical ones. For this kind of price, I would rather own
a Dendreon with a phase 3 candidate, a different phase 2 hopeful, and several
other earlier-stage drugs in development.
Like the quest for the Holy Grail that caused the demise of many a gallant
knight, the quest for a cancer vaccine has littered the roadside with fallen
biotechnology companies. Will Geron succeed? The complete results from this
trial are scheduled to be released in December. I'll be watching, but from the
sidelines -- unlike some folks on the Geron discussion
board.
For life science and other companies generating mountains of free cash
flow, join Tom Gardner in Motley
Fool Stock Advisor!
David Nierengarten, Ph.D., often contributes to Fool.com and is an active
member of the Fool
community. He works at a biotechnology venture fund that
specializes in early-stage financing. He owns shares of Dendreon. He
appreciates your comments at davidnierengarten@mac.com
and on the Biotechnology discussion
board.
|